United States v. Engle

60 F. App'x 476
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 1, 2003
Docket02-4777
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 F. App'x 476 (United States v. Engle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Engle, 60 F. App'x 476 (4th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

William J. Engle appeals his conviction and 120 month sentence for conspiracy to distribute dilaudid, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000). On appeal, Engle argues that under Fed.R.Evid. 609(b), the district court erred in excluding evidence of a Government witness’ 1987 conviction for drug crimes.

We review this claim for abuse of discretion. United States v. Carter, 300 F.3d 415, 423 (4th Cir.2002). Engle’s claim is meritless. Engle cannot establish that, under Fed.R.Evid. 609, the district court abused its discretion by excluding evidence of the Government witness’s 1987 conviction, because he cannot establish the evidence’s probative value in undermining the Government witness’s credibility substantially outweighed its prejudicial effect. Fed.R.Evid. 609(b); United States v. Beahm, 664 F.2d 414, 418 (4th Cir.1981); United States v. Cavender, 578 F.2d 528, 531 (4th Cir.1978).

Accordingly, we affirm Engle’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Engle v. United States
540 U.S. 888 (Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F. App'x 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-engle-ca4-2003.