United States v. England

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2026·No. 26-10134·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 26-10134 Document: 39-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/03/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 26-10134

FILED

August 3, 2026

Summary Calendar ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Noah Adam England,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-9-1

Before Willett, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Noah Adam England appeals from the judgment of the district court revoking his term of supervised release and imposing 11 months of imprisonment and an additional term of supervised release. For the first time on appeal, he argues that 18 U.S.C. § 3583(g) is unconstitutional in light of United States v. Haymond, 588 U.S. 634 (2019). He correctly concedes that his position is foreclosed. See United States v. Garner, 969 F.3d 550, 551-53

*

This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

Case: 26-10134 Document: 39-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/03/2026

No. 26-10134

(5th Cir. 2020). Summary affirmance is therefore proper. See Groendyke Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969).

Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. England, (5th Cir. 2026).

United States v. England (United States v. England) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Haymond
588 U.S. 634 (Supreme Court, 2019)
United States v. Christopher Garner
969 F.3d 550 (Fifth Circuit, 2020)