United States v. Emilio Borja-Estrada

418 F. App'x 322
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 16, 2011
Docket10-40840
StatusUnpublished

This text of 418 F. App'x 322 (United States v. Emilio Borja-Estrada) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Emilio Borja-Estrada, 418 F. App'x 322 (5th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Emilio Borja-Estrada appeals the sentence of 80 months of imprisonment imposed following his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after deportation. Borja-Estrada argues that the use of a prior alien smuggling conviction to both enhance his offense level and to calculate his criminal history score constitutes impermissible double counting. As Borja-Estrada concedes, his argument is foreclosed by precedent. See United States v. Kings, 981 F.2d 790, 796 (5th Cir.1993). Accordingly, the Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, its alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
418 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-emilio-borja-estrada-ca5-2011.