United States v. Emerson

25 F. Cas. 1012, 4 D.C. 188, 4 Cranch 188
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia·Decided December 15, 1831·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

The Court

(nem. con.) was of opinion that the language used by each to the. other, in the presence of the Court, was a contempt ; and that the attack made by Emerson upon Childs, in the hall of entrance, while the Court was sitting, was either “ in the presence of the Court, or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice,” within the meaning of the Act of Congress of the 2d of March, 1831, (pamphlet, p. 99,) declaratory of the law concerning contempts of court.”

The Court therefore imposed a fine of five dollars upon each of the parties.

The grand jury having afterward found an indictment against Emerson for the assault and battery, and he having submitted to the Court, was fined five dollars upon that indictment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Emerson, 25 F. Cas. 1012, 4 D.C. 188, 4 Cranch 188 (circtddc 1831).

25 F. Cas. 1012 (United States v. Emerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hirschfeld v. SUPERIOR COURT FOR MARICOPA
908 P.2d 22 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1995)
United States v. Barnett
376 U.S. 681 (Supreme Court, 1964)
In re Chaifetz
68 A.2d 228 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1949)
Gridley v. United States
44 F.2d 716 (Sixth Circuit, 1930)
People v. Clancy
239 Ill. App. 369 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1926)
Steube v. State
3 Ohio C.C. 383 (Ohio Circuit Courts, 1888)
United States v. Anonymous
21 F. 761 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1884)
In re Cary
10 F. 622 (S.D. New York, 1882)