United States v. Ely

381 F. App'x 969
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 9, 2010·No. No. 09-11838·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael R. Howard, appointed counsel for Christopher R. Ely in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ely’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ely, 381 F. App'x 969 (11th Cir. 2010).

381 F. App'x 969 (United States v. Ely) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)