United States v. Elven Swisher

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Elven Swisher

785 F.3d 1365, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8258, 2015 WL 2381238

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Elven Swisher. Read the opinion of the Court — 811 F.3d 299 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 19, 2015·No. 11-35796·Published

Opinion

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Tallman did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge Tallman did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

United States v. Elven Swisher, 785 F.3d 1365, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8258, 2015 WL 2381238 (9th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

785 F.3d 1365 (United States v. Elven Swisher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.