United States v. Elsie Mumma

237 F.2d 795, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 1956
Docket11887_1
StatusPublished

This text of 237 F.2d 795 (United States v. Elsie Mumma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Elsie Mumma, 237 F.2d 795, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969 (3d Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment for civil penalties under the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C. § 1281 et seq.

Appellant’s sole contention is that the Act is unconstitutional. In line with this, she argues that Wickard v. Filburn, 1942, 317 U.S. 111, 63 S.Ct. 82, 87 L.Ed. 122, which upheld the constitutionality of the Act and the cases which followed that decision, including our own Blattner v. United States, 3 Cir., 1955, 223 F.2d 468, were all decided erroneously. We disagree with that view.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wickard v. Filburn
317 U.S. 111 (Supreme Court, 1942)
Joseph Blattner v. United States
223 F.2d 468 (Third Circuit, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
237 F.2d 795, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 2969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-elsie-mumma-ca3-1956.