United States v. Eloy Moreno-Torres
This text of 41 F. App'x 28 (United States v. Eloy Moreno-Torres) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Eloy Moreno-Torres pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), as well as a forfeiture count. The district court * gave Moreno-Torres a two-level obstruction-of-justice increase for attempting to bribe a witness and sentenced him to 97 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Moreno-Torres contends the district court improperly applied the obstruction-of-justice increase.
We conclude the district court did not commit error. See United States v. Simms, 285 F.3d 1098, 1100 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review). The undisputed testimony at sentencing-that Moreno-Torres offered a witness money in exchange for perjured testimony-was sufficient to warrant application of the increase. See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 comment, (n.4) (2001); United States v. Pompey, 121 F.3d 381, 382 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1133, 118 S.Ct. 1088, 140 L.Ed.2d 145 (1998).
We thus affirm the sentence imposed by the district court.
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F. App'x 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eloy-moreno-torres-ca8-2002.