United States v. Eloy Moreno-Torres

41 F. App'x 28
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2002·No. 02-1748·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eloy Moreno-Torres pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2000), as well as a forfeiture count. The district court * gave Moreno-Torres a two-level obstruction-of-justice increase for attempting to bribe a witness and sentenced him to 97 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Moreno-Torres contends the district court improperly applied the obstruction-of-justice increase.

We conclude the district court did not commit error. See United States v. Simms, 285 F.3d 1098, 1100 (8th Cir.2002) (standard of review). The undisputed testimony at sentencing-that Moreno-Torres offered a witness money in exchange for perjured testimony-was sufficient to warrant application of the increase. See U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1 comment, (n.4) (2001); United States v. Pompey, 121 F.3d 381, 382 (8th Cir.1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1133, 118 S.Ct. 1088, 140 L.Ed.2d 145 (1998).

We thus affirm the sentence imposed by the district court.

*

The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Eloy Moreno-Torres, 41 F. App'x 28 (8th Cir. 2002).

41 F. App'x 28 (United States v. Eloy Moreno-Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Bruce C. Pompey
121 F.3d 381 (Eighth Circuit, 1997)
United States v. Cordell Ray Simms
285 F.3d 1098 (Eighth Circuit, 2002)
Calderon-Hernandez v. United States
522 U.S. 1133 (Supreme Court, 1998)