United States v. Eloi

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Eloi

669 F. App'x 551

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 13, 2016·No. No. 15-13868 Non-Argument Calendar·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert Godfrey, appointed appellate counsel for Jean Eloi, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eloi’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert Godfrey, appointed appellate counsel for Jean Eloi, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eloi’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. All pending motions are DENIED as moot.

United States v. Eloi, 669 F. App'x 551 (11th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 551 (United States v. Eloi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related