United States v. Ellis

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Ellis. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 F.3d 908
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 9, 1999·No. 99-6790·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6790

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LEROY ELLIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-36-D, CA-99-50-7)

Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 9, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy Ellis, Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Leroy Ellis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999). We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Ellis, Nos. CR-94-36-D; CA-99-50-7

(W.D. Va. May 26, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-

terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ellis, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Ellis (United States v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related