United States v. Elliott
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-50194 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
AMOS ELLIOTT, JR.,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 94-CR-171-1 - - - - - - - - - - November 30, 1995
Before WIENER, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Amos Elliott, Jr., has appealed the sufficiency of the
evidence supporting his convictions for theft of government money
and money laundering. Elliott argues that his convictions should
be reversed because there is insufficient evidence that he stole
money from the Government. We have reviewed the briefs and the
record and discern no reversible error.
AFFIRMED.
*
Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Elliott (United States v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.