United States v. Elliott

684 F. App'x 315
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2017·No. No. 16-7636·Published

Opinion

[316] Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Damon Emanuel Elliott appeals the district court’s order declining to file Elliott’s free-standing DNA motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Elliott, No. 8:97-cr-00053-PJM-1 (D. Md. Oct. 31, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Elliott, 684 F. App'x 315 (4th Cir. 2017).

684 F. App'x 315 (United States v. Elliott) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.