United States v. Eliseo Becerra

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 25, 2019
Docket18-1003
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Eliseo Becerra (United States v. Eliseo Becerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eliseo Becerra, (8th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 18-1003 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Eliseo L. Becerra

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________

Submitted: November 12, 2018 Filed: January 25, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________

Before GRUENDER, KELLY, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Eliseo Becerra pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). The presentence investigation report (“PSR”) calculated a base offense level of 20 because Becerra previously had sustained a conviction that qualified as a crime of violence. See U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). After further adjustments, the PSR calculated a total offense level of 21, a criminal history category of VI, and an advisory sentencing guidelines range of 77 to 96 months. The district court1 varied downward and sentenced Becerra to 60 months’ imprisonment. Becerra appeals the designation of his Missouri second- degree robbery conviction as a crime of violence.

We review de novo the determination that a prior conviction qualifies as a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4). United States v. Welch, 879 F.3d 324, 326 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam). In United States v. Swopes, 886 F.3d 668 (8th Cir. 2018) (en banc), petition for cert. filed, --- U.S.L.W. --- (U.S. Aug. 30, 2018) (No. 18-5838), we held that Missouri second-degree robbery qualifies as a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”). Becerra concedes that Swopes rejected his argument, and in United States v. Young, 720 F. App’x 803 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam), we determined that Swopes foreclosed the argument that Missouri second-degree robbery does not qualify as a crime of violence under the sentencing guidelines. See also United States v. Hall, 877 F.3d 800, 806 (8th Cir. 2017) (explaining that crime of violence under the guidelines and violent felony under the ACCA have “nearly identical definitions” and that we view them as “interchangeable”). Thus, we affirm. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Anthony Hall, Jr.
877 F.3d 800 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
United States v. Joe Welch
879 F.3d 324 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)
United States v. Hosea Swopes
886 F.3d 668 (Eighth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Eliseo Becerra, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eliseo-becerra-ca8-2019.