United States v. Eliely

276 F. App'x 270
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 2008
Docket19-1693
StatusUnpublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 276 F. App'x 270 (United States v. Eliely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eliely, 276 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Shawn Eliely appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for release on recognizance or bail pending the court’s consideration of Eliely’s post-conviction motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). 1 Before a prisoner may be released on bail pending a collateral attack on his conviction, he must show substantial constitutional claims on which he has a high probability of success, and exceptional circumstances making a grant of bail necessary for the habeas remedy to be effective. See Lee v. Jabe, 989 F.2d 869, 871 (6th Cir.1993); Calley v. Callaway, 496 F.2d 701, 702 (5th Cir.1974). Eliely fails *271 to meet this standard. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. 2

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

1

. We have jurisdiction over this appeal under the collateral order doctrine. See Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-57, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949).

2

. We also deny Eliely's motion to expedite as moot and deny his motion for summary relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brandon v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2021
Coreas v. Bounds
D. Maryland, 2021
Young v. Antonelli
D. South Carolina, 2021
Rhodes v. Dobbs
D. South Carolina, 2020
Ingram v. United States
W.D. North Carolina, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 F. App'x 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eliely-ca4-2008.