United States v. Elgersma

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Elgersma

938 F.2d 179, 1991 WL 135484

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJuly 24, 1991

DocketNos. 89-3926, 89-3934

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 938 F.2d 179 (United States v. Elgersma) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Elgersma, 938 F.2d 179, 1991 WL 135484 (11th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion April 29, 1991, 11th Cir., 1991, 929 F.2d 1538)

Before TJOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, CLARK, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH and DUBINA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI