United States v. Elegonye

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 8, 1998·No. 97-41361·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-41361 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NDUBUISI CELESTINE ELEGONYE,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (6:96-CR-56-1) ____________________________________________ July 1, 1998 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Ndubuisi Celestine Elegonye

has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), and we have independently reviewed counsel’s brief, the

record, and Elegonye’s response to counsel’s motion to withdraw and

find no nonfrivolous issues. Elegonye asks this court to appoint

counsel to represent him in his direct criminal appeal. There

being no nonfrivolous issues for appeal, and Elegonye having duly

waived his right to appeal, there is no justification for

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. -2-

appointing new counsel. Elegonye’s motion for appointment of

counsel is DENIED. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED,

and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. Local R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Elegonye, (5th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Elegonye (United States v. Elegonye) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)