United States v. Eleftherates

CourtNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals
DecidedMay 27, 2014
Docket201400142
StatusPublished

This text of United States v. Eleftherates (United States v. Eleftherates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eleftherates, (N.M. 2014).

Opinion

UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS WASHINGTON, D.C.

Be fore F.D. M ITCHELL, J.A. FISCHER, M .G. M ILLER Appe llate M ilitary Judge s

UNITED STATES OF AM ERICA

v.

NICHOLAS A. ELEFTHERATOS LOGISTICS SPECIALIST THIRD CLASS (E-4), U.S. NAVY

NM CCA 201400142 SPECIAL COURT-M ARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 27 January 2014. Military Judge: CAPT Bethany Payton-O’Brien, JAGC, USN. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN 74). Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LCDR C.H. Hutchinson II, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: CAPT Stephen White, JAGC, USN. For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

27 May 2014

--------------------------------------------------- OPINION OF THE COURT ---------------------------------------------------

THIS OPINION DOES NOT SERVE AS BINDING PRECEDENT, BUT MAY BE CITED AS PERSUASIVE AUTHORITY UNDER NMCCA RULE OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE 18.2.

PER CURIAM:

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted the appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of making a false official statement and two specifications of stealing property of the United States Government valued at more than $500.00, in violation of Articles 107 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 921. The appellant was sentenced to confinement for 90 days, a $400.00 fine, and bad-conduct discharge. Pursuant to the pretrial agreement, the convening authority (CA) suspended the bad- conduct discharge until the administrative separation process was completed and the DD-214 was issued, at which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended punitive discharge would be remitted without further action.

After carefully reviewing the record, submitted without assignment of error, we note that the CA did not disapprove the adjudged fine as required by the pretrial agreement. We will take corrective action in our decretal paragraph.

We affirm the findings and the sentence, except for that portion of the sentence which provides for a fine of $400.00. Arts. 59(a) and 66(c), UCMJ; United States v. Cox, 46 C.M.R. 69 (C.M.A. 1972).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Eleftherates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eleftherates-nmcca-2014.