United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson

651 F. App'x 568
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 669 F. App'x 319
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2016·No. 16-1214·Unpublished

Opinion

*569 PER CURIAM.

Eldon Anderson appeals the district court’s 1 order modifying his supervised release conditions to add a special condition that he reside for a period of up to 120 days in a residential reentry center, as approved by his probation officer. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in adding the condition, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(2); and additionally, we decline to consider Anderson’s attempt, in his pro se submissions before us, to collaterally attack his underlying conviction, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 913 (8th Cir. 2009). Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson, 651 F. App'x 568 (8th Cir. 2016).

651 F. App'x 568 (United States v. Eldon Philip Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Miller
557 F.3d 910 (Eighth Circuit, 2009)