United States v. Elbert Wade, AKA Elbert Lloyd Wade and George Carroll
Opinion
Appellants were convicted of violating 18 U.S.C.A. § 876 by mailing a threatening communication for the purposes of extortion. We have examined the assignments of error contained in the brief filed by counsel for appellants; the additional assignments of error contained in a supplemental brief filed pro se by appellants; as well as the allegations contained in other documents and communications filed by appellants separately with the court. There is no merit in the contentions of error, whether viewed separately or en masse.
The judgments of conviction are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
473 F.2d 1390 (United States v. Elbert Wade, AKA Elbert Lloyd Wade and George Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.