United States v. Elbert L. Hatchett

856 F.2d 196, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11156, 1988 WL 84112
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Elbert L. Hatchett. Read the opinion of the Court — 918 F.2d 631
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided August 15, 1988·No. 88-1529·Unpublished

Opinion

856 F.2d 196

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Elbert L. HATCHETT, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-1529.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 15, 1988.

Before KENNEDY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge*.

ORDER

Defendant appeals from the district court's order which denied his motion to disqualify Judge Gilmore in this civil tax action. An order refusing to disqualify a judge is not appealable. City of Cleveland v. Krupansky, 619 F.2d 576 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 834 (1980). Likewise, such an order is not reviewable by way of mandamus. In re City of Detroit, 828 F.2d 1160 (6th Cir.1987). Accordingly, the appeal in Case No. 88-1529 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

*

The Honorable Herman J. Weber, U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Elbert L. Hatchett, 856 F.2d 196, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11156, 1988 WL 84112 (6th Cir. 1988).

856 F.2d 196 (United States v. Elbert L. Hatchett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Cleveland v. Krupansky
619 F.2d 576 (Sixth Circuit, 1980)