United States v. El Shami
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-6757
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
ESSAM HELMI EL SHAMI,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:03-cr-00294-HEH-1; 3:06-cv-00483-HEH)
Submitted: March 8, 2011 Decided: March 22, 2011
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Essam Helmi El Shami, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Essam Helmi El Shami appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2006) motion. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
United States v. El Shami, No. 3:03-cr-00294-HEH-1 (E.D. Va.
Feb. 24, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. El Shami (United States v. El Shami) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.