United States v. Efrain Garcia-Jaimes
This text of 484 F.3d 1311 (United States v. Efrain Garcia-Jaimes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPT 25, 2008 No. 05-14475 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
D. C. Docket No. 03-00493 CR-17-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERTO MORENO-GONZALEZ, a.k.a. Beto,
Defendant-Appellant. _______________
No. 05-17251 _______________
D. C. Docket No. 03-00493 CR-3-1
LEONARDO NUNEZ-VIRRAIZABAL, Defendant-Appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
(September 25, 2008)
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before DUBINA and COX, Circuit Judges, and SCHLESINGER,* District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.
The Supreme Court vacated this court’s judgment in the Roberto Moreno-Gonzalez
and Leonardo Nunez-Virraizabal cases and remanded for further consideration in
light of Cuellar v. United States, 128 S. Ct. 1994 (2008). United States v. Garcia-
Jaimes, 484 F.3d 1311 (11th Cir. 2007), vacated sub nom. Moreno-Gonzalez v.
United States, 128 S. Ct. 2901 (2008) and Nunez-Virraizabal v. United States, 128
S. Ct. 2901 (2008).
The parties have filed supplemental briefs following remand, and agree that
only the convictions on Count 26 are at issue. Accordingly, we now vacate Roberto’s
and Leonardo’s convictions on Count 26, and vacate Roberto’s and Leonardo’s
* Honorable Harvey E. Schlesinger, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation.
2 sentences, and remand their cases to the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia for further consideration and further proceedings consistent with
the opinion of the Supreme Court in Cuellar.
We reinstate the vacation of Roberto’s gun conviction and affirm all
convictions other than Roberto’s gun conviction and Roberto’s and Leonardo’s Count
26 convictions for reasons stated in our prior opinion.
AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; VACATED AND
REMANDED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
484 F.3d 1311, 313 F. App'x 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-efrain-garcia-jaimes-ca11-2008.