United States v. Edwards

600 F. App'x 1012
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedApril 30, 2015
DocketNo. 15-1157
StatusPublished

This text of 600 F. App'x 1012 (United States v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Edwards, 600 F. App'x 1012 (7th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

order

William Edwards sought relief under Amendments 750 and 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Both of these amendments apply certain changes to the drug-quantity tables retroactively. See 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The district court denied the motion, ruling that Edwards is accountable for so much cocaine (more than 150 kilograms) that neither change reduces his sentencing range. Without such a reduction § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a lower sentence.

Edwards’s appeal contends that the district judge was not entitled to recalculate the quantity for which he is responsible; he insists that at his sentencing the judge found him accountable for only 1.5 kilograms of cocaine. He made the very same contention when seeking a reduction under an earlier retroactive change to the Guidelines. We rejected his argument then, United States v. Edwards, 370 Fed.Appx. 738 (7th Cir.2010) (nonprecedential disposition), and our analysis in that order demonstrates that the current appeal likewise is unavailing. Like the district judge, we concluded that at the original sentencing, the judge accepted the findings proposed in the presentence report, which concluded that Edwards is accountable for more than 4.5 kilograms of cocaine per week, over a period of many years. Given that finding, the revisions to the Guidelines do not affect his sentencing range.

Affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. William Edwards
370 F. App'x 738 (Seventh Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
600 F. App'x 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edwards-ca7-2015.