United States v. Edwards
This text of United States v. Edwards (United States v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-51289 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CHARLES LOYD EDWARDS,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-01-CR-82-ALL -------------------- August 21, 2002
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Court-appointed counsel for Charles Loyd Edwards has
requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Edwards has not
responded to his counsel’s motion. Our independent review of
counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue
for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-51289 -2-
counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal
is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Edwards, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edwards-ca5-2002.