United States v. Edwards

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Edwards

516 F. App'x 254

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 1, 2013·No. No. 12-7912·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Edwards, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5H1.11 (2012). As Edwards was sentenced in 2007, his motion is untimely. In addition, to the extent Edwards relies upon Amendment 739 to the Guidelines (amending § 5H1.11 in 2010), this amendment has not been made retroactively applicable. See USSG § lB1.10(c). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jimmy Edwards, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence departure under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5H1.11 (2012). As Edwards was sentenced in 2007, his motion is untimely. In addition, to the extent Edwards relies upon Amendment 739 to the Guidelines (amending § 5H1.11 in 2010), this amendment has not been made retroactively applicable. See USSG § lB1.10(c). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Edwards, 516 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

516 F. App'x 254 (United States v. Edwards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.