United States v. Edward Verdin
This text of 423 F. App'x 483 (United States v. Edward Verdin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edward Paul Verdin appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to mail fraud and money laundering. He argues that the district court clearly erred in applying a four-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2Bl.l(b)(14)(B)(i) based on a finding that he substantially jeopardized the safety and soundness of a financial institution.
We review the district court’s application of the enhancement for clear error. United States v. Juarez, 626 F.3d 246, 251 (5th Cir.2010). The Government presented unrebutted evidence that Verdin misrepresented the amount of the institution’s reserves, leading to the payment of a dividend that placed the institution in a dire financial position from which it could not recover. This testimony, among other testimony from the witness called by the Government, thus supported a finding that the financial institution was rendered insolvent substantially on account of Verdin’s actions, warranting the enhancement. See U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, comment (n,12(A)); cf. United States v. Blocker, 104 F.3d 720, 736-37 (5th Cir.1997).
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 F. App'x 483, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edward-verdin-ca5-2011.