United States v. Edward Roach

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided May 30, 2012·No. 19-1481·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1035

United States of America, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri.

Edward Roach, * * [UNPUBLISHED]

Defendant-Appellant. *

Submitted: April 16, 2012 Filed: May 30, 2012

Before MELLOY, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM.

Edward Roach pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Roach now argues only that his conviction and resulting incarceration violate his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. "To the extent [Roach] brings a facial challenge to § 922(g), his arguments are foreclosed by our circuit precedent." United States v. Aiello, 452 F. App'x 699, 700 (8th Cir. 2012); see also District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570, 626–27 (2008) ("[N]othing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the

carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.").

We affirm the judgment of the district court.1 See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Edward Roach, (8th Cir. 2012).

United States v. Edward Roach (United States v. Edward Roach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

District of Columbia v. Heller
554 U.S. 570 (Supreme Court, 2008)
United States v. Shawn Aiello
452 F. App'x 699 (Eighth Circuit, 2012)