United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski
16 F.3d 704, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696, 1994 WL 47889
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided February 17, 1994·No. 93-1079·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Prior report: 8 F.3d 1113.
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.
*705 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski, 16 F.3d 704, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696, 1994 WL 47889 (6th Cir. 1994).
16 F.3d 704 (United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Edward Czuprynski
65 F.3d 169 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski
46 F.3d 560 (Sixth Circuit, 1995)