United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski

16 F.3d 704, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696, 1994 WL 47889

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 17, 1994

Docket93-1079

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 16 F.3d 704 (United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Edward M. Czuprynski, 16 F.3d 704, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 2696, 1994 WL 47889 (6th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Prior report: 8 F.3d 1113.

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal.

*705 Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as possible.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI