United States v. Edward Ellsworth Wilson
This text of 392 F.2d 979 (United States v. Edward Ellsworth Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This is an appeal, by the government from an order made by the district court under Rule 41(e) and 57(b), Fed.R.Crim.P., after a hearing which suppressed certain physical evidence, i. e., marijuana. Appellee had been indicted for a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a, and had pleaded not guilty. Jurisdiction here rests on 18 U.S.C. § 1404 and 28 U.S.C. § 1294.
An appeal from another portion of the district court order was neither waived nor urged by the government, on oral argument. We consider it moot.
On the authority of Corngold v. United States, 367 F.2d 1 (9th Cir. 1966), the order of suppression is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
392 F.2d 979, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edward-ellsworth-wilson-ca9-1968.