United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona

448 F.2d 1355, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7820

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 30, 1971

Docket26338_1

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 448 F.2d 1355 (United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Eduardo Osuna-Lorona, 448 F.2d 1355, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7820 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment and conviction in this narcotics case for transporting and facilitating the sale of 10 ounces of heroin is affirmed. The district court’s resolution of conflicting facts concerning the admissibility of appellant's statement must be sustained on appeal, and the 10 year sentence he received does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Gallego v. United States, 276 F.2d 914, 917-918 (9 Cir. 1960); Black v. United States, 269 F.2d 38, 43 (9 Cir. 1959).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The judgment and conviction in this narcotics case for transporting and facilitating the sale of 10 ounces of heroin is affirmed. The district court’s resolution of conflicting facts concerning the admissibility of appellant's statement must be sustained on appeal, and the 10 year sentence he received does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Gallego v. United States, 276 F.2d 914, 917-918 (9 Cir. 1960); Black v. United States, 269 F.2d 38, 43 (9 Cir. 1959).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

448 F.2d 1355, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eduardo-osuna-lorona-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack