United States v. Eduardo Aranzola
This text of 438 F.2d 127 (United States v. Eduardo Aranzola) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
438 F.2d 127
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Eduardo ARANZOLA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 29019.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
February 3, 1971.
Appeal from the United States for the Southern District of Florida; Charles B. Fulton, Chief Judge.
Eduardo Aranzola, pro se.
L. Frank Chopin, Miami, Fla., (Court Appointed), for defendant-appellant.
Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Jose E. Martinez, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and TUTTLE and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed under the controlling authority of Buie v. United States, 1969, 396 U.S. 87, 90 S.Ct. 284, 24 L.Ed.2d 283. See Local Rule 21.1
Notes:
See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F. 2d 966
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
438 F.2d 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eduardo-aranzola-ca5-1971.