United States v. Edmondson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2003·No. 02-40714·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D April 24, 2003 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

No. 02-40714 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SAMUEL PASQUAL EDMONDSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CV-356 USDC No. 4:96-CR-63-1 --------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Samuel Pasqual Edmondson, federal prisoner # 05102-010,

appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion. He asserts that although Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530

U.S. 466 (2000), was decided after his conviction became final,

it effected a substantive change in criminal law and is

applicable to his case. Apprendi is not retroactively applicable

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-40714 -2-

to cases on collateral review. See United States v. Brown, 305

F.3d 304, 305-09 (5th Cir. 2002), petition for cert. filed (U.S.

Feb. 3, 2003)(No. 02-9606). The argument is foreclosed by the

law of this circuit. Brown, 305 F.3d at 305-09. The judgment of

the district court is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Edmondson, (5th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Edmondson (United States v. Edmondson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Brown
305 F.3d 304 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)
Apprendi v. New Jersey
530 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 2000)