United States v. Edmodo, LLC

District Court, N.D. California·Decided June 27, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-02495·Unknown

Opinion

BRIAN M. BOYNTON, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General ARUN G. RAO, Deputy Assistant Attorney General AMANDA N. LISKAMM, Director LISA K. HSIAO, Assistant Director JAMES T. NELSON, Senior Trial Attorney U.S. Department of Justice Fl L E. D Consumer Protection Branch Civil Division 450 Sth Street N.W. Jun 27 2023 Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 616-2376 Mark B. Busby james.nelson2@usdoj.gov CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ISMAIL J. RAMSEY (CABN 189820) NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States Attorney SAN FRANCISCO MICHELLE LO (NYRN 4325163) Chief, Civil Division VIVIAN F. WANG (CABN 277577) 1] Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney’s Office Northern District of California 450 Golden Gate Ave. San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7136 14]) 2. vivian.wang@usdo].gov NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 23-cv-2495 TSH Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED v. ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND CIVIL EDMODO, LLC, a limited liability PENALTY JUDGMENT corporation. Defendant. Plaintiff, the United States of America, acting upon notification and authorization to the Attorney General by the Federal Trade Commission (“Commission”), filed its Complaint for Permanent PPReEPeEsSED] STIPUT.ATED ORDER

Injunction, Civil Penalties, and Other Equitable Relief (“Complaint”) in this matter, pursuant to Sections 13(b) and 16(a)(1) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 53(b) and 56(a)(1), Sections 1303(c) and 1306(d) of the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (“COPPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 6502(c) and 6505(d), and the Commission’s Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (“COPPA Rule”), 16 C.F.R. Part 312 (attached as Appendix A). Defendant has waived service of the summons and the Complaint. The parties have been represented by the attorneys whose names appear hereafter. Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate to the entry of this Stipulated Order for Permanent Injunction and Civil Penalty Judgment (“Order”) to resolve all matters in dispute in this action between them. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter. 2. The Complaint charges that Defendant violated the COPPA Rule by failing to obtain Verifiable Parental Consent prior to Collecting, using, or Disclosing Personal Information of Children, and retaining Personal Information Collected online from Children for longer than reasonably necessary to fulfill the purpose for which the information was Collected. The Complaint also charges that Defendant violated the FTC Act by unfairly requiring Schools and teachers to comply with the COPPA Rule on its behalf without providing adequate information or support to meet the Rule’s requirements. 3. Defendant neither admits nor denies any of the allegations in the Complaint, except as specifically stated in this Order. Only for purposes of this action, Defendant admits the facts necessary to establish jurisdiction. 4. Defendant waives any claim that it may have under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, concerning the prosecution of this action through the date of this Order, and agrees to bear its own costs and attorney fees. 5. Defendant and Plaintiff waive all rights to appeal or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Order. For the purpose of this Order, the following definitions apply: A. “Affected Work Product” means any models or algorithms developed in whole or in part using Personal Information Collected from Children through the Edmodo Platform without Verifiable Parental Consent or School Authorization. B. “Child” means an individual under the age of 13. C. “Clear and Conspicuous” means that a required disclosure is difficult to miss (i.e., is easily noticeable) and is easily understandable by ordinary consumers, including in all of the following ways: 1. In any communication that is solely visual or solely audible, the disclosure must be made through the same means through which the communication is presented. In any communication made through both visual and audible means, such as a television advertisement, the disclosure must be presented simultaneously in both the visual and audible portions of the communication even if the representation requiring the disclosure is made through only one means. 2. A visual disclosure, by its size, contrast, location, the length of time it appears, and other characteristics, must stand out from any accompanying text or other visual elements so that it is easily noticed, read, and understood. 3. An audible disclosure, including by telephone or streaming video, must be delivered in a volume, speed, and cadence sufficient for ordinary consumers to easily hear and understand it. 4. In any communication using an interactive electronic medium, such as the Internet or software, the disclosure must be unavoidable. 5. The disclosure must use diction and syntax understandable to ordinary consumers and must appear in each language in which the representation that requires the disclosure appears. 6. The disclosure must comply with these requirements in each medium through which it is received, including all electronic devices and face-to-face communications. 7. The disclosure must not be contradicted or mitigated by, or inconsistent with, anything else in the communication. 8. When the representation or sales practice targets a specific audience, such as Children, the elderly, or the terminally ill, “ordinary consumers” includes reasonable members of that group. D. “Collects” or “Collection” means the gathering of any Personal Information from a Child by any means, including but not limited to: 1. Requesting, prompting, or encouraging a Child to submit Personal Information online; 2. Enabling a Child to make Personal Information publicly available in identifiable form; or 3. Passive tracking of a Child online. E. “Defendant” means Edmodo, LLC (“Edmodo”), a Delaware limited liability company, its successors and assigns. F. “Direct Control” means the School has a means to review the Personal Information Collected from a Child, prevent further use or future Collection from that Child, and direct the Operator to delete a Child’s Personal Information. G. “Direct Notice” means making a reasonable effort (taking into consideration available technology) to ensure that a Parent or School receives notice of the Operator’s practices with regard to the Collection, use, or Disclosure of Personal Information Collected from a Child, including notice of any material change in the Collection, use or Disclosure practices to which the Parent or School has previously consented. H. “Disclose” or “Disclosure” means, with respect to Personal Information: 1. The Release of Personal Information Collected by an Operator from a Child in identifiable form for any purpose, except where an Operator provides such information to a person who provides Support for the Internal Operations of the Website or Online Service; and 2. Making Personal Information Collected by an Operator from a Child publicly available in identifiable form by any means, including but not limited to a public posting through the Internet, or through a personal home page or screen posted on a website or online service; a pen pal service; an electronic mail service; a message board; or a chat room. I. “Edmodo Platform” means any online or mobile education-related webs

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Edmodo, LLC, (N.D. Cal. 2023).

United States v. Edmodo, LLC (United States v. Edmodo, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related