United States v. Edgar Nelson Pitts

654 F. App'x 322
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 2016
Docket15-10085
StatusUnpublished

This text of 654 F. App'x 322 (United States v. Edgar Nelson Pitts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Edgar Nelson Pitts, 654 F. App'x 322 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Edgar Nelson Pitts appeals the 150-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for voluntary manslaughter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1112. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Pitts contends that his high-end, fully consecutive sentence is substantively unreasonable in light of the circumstances of the offense and the length of his two undischarged sentences. The district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Pitts’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances, including the nature of the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(a); Gall, 552 U.S. at 51, 128-S.Ct. 586.

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gall v. United States
552 U.S. 38 (Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 F. App'x 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-edgar-nelson-pitts-ca9-2016.