United States v. Eddie Johnson

84 F. App'x 736
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 15, 2004
Docket03-2247
StatusUnpublished

This text of 84 F. App'x 736 (United States v. Eddie Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Eddie Johnson, 84 F. App'x 736 (8th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eddie Johnson pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(l)(A)(iii), and 846 and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court 1 sentenced him to 121 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal Johnson’s counsel has moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is too long.

We reject this argument, because the sentence is within both the statutory range and the applicable Sentencing Guidelines range, and Johnson agreed in a written plea agreement that his prison term would be at least 121 months. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(l)(A)(iii) (penalty of 10 years to life imprisonment); United States v. Smotherman, 326 F.3d 988, 989 (8th Cir.) (per curiam) (district court’s exercise of discretion in setting defendant’s sentence within properly determined Guidelines range is nonreviewable), cert. denied, —U.S.—, 124 S.Ct. 293, 157 L.Ed.2d 203 (2003); United States v. Nguyen, 46 F.3d 781, 783 (8th Cir.1995) (defendant who vol *737 untarily subjects himself to specific sentence may not challenge that punishment on appeal).

Upon careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 846, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Michael Quoc Anh Nguyen
46 F.3d 781 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Richard Don Smotherman
326 F.3d 988 (Eighth Circuit, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
84 F. App'x 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eddie-johnson-ca8-2004.