United States v. Eddie Graves
This text of 68 F. App'x 766 (United States v. Eddie Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this direct criminal appeal, Graves challenges the sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute, 5 kilograms or more of a substance containing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(b)(1), 846. The district court sentenced Graves to 120 months imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, Graves’s counsel has moved to withdraw under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the district court erred in denying his motion for a downward departure.
The district court’s decision not to grant the downward departure was clearly discretionary; thus, the decision is unreview *767 able. See United States v. VanHouten, 307 F.3d 693, 696 (8th Cir.2002) (discretionary decision not to depart from Guidelines is unreviewable on appeal absent unconstitutional motive, unless district court erroneously concluded it lacked authority to depart).
Following careful review of the record, we find no other nonfrivolous issues. See Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We also grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
A true copy.
. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 F. App'x 766, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eddie-graves-ca8-2003.