United States v. Echeagaray-Leon
This text of 167 F. App'x 613 (United States v. Echeagaray-Leon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Victor Echeagaray-Leon appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 42-month sentence for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Echeagaray-Leon has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Echeagaray-Leon has filed a pro se supplemental brief.
Our examination of the brief and independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no grounds for relief. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 F. App'x 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-echeagaray-leon-ca9-2006.