United States v. Eccles

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Eccles

381 F. App'x 911

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJune 3, 2010

DocketNo. 09-14652

StatusPublished

This text of 381 F. App'x 911 (United States v. Eccles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Eccles, 381 F. App'x 911 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sylvia A. Irvin, counsel for Ivan Joseph Eccles, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eccles’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sylvia A. Irvin, counsel for Ivan Joseph Eccles, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eccles’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

381 F. App'x 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-eccles-ca11-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack