United States v. Eccles

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Eccles

381 F. App'x 911

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided June 3, 2010·No. No. 09-14652·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sylvia A. Irvin, counsel for Ivan Joseph Eccles, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eccles’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sylvia A. Irvin, counsel for Ivan Joseph Eccles, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Eccles’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Eccles, 381 F. App'x 911 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

381 F. App'x 911 (United States v. Eccles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related