United States v. Easton
71 M.J. 6, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1071
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Easton. Read the opinion of the Court — 71 M.J. 168 →
Opinion
CCA 20080640. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THE APPELLANT’S TRIAL DID NOT VIOLATE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY BECAUSE JEOPARDY DID NOT ATTACH AND EVEN IF IT DID, MANIFEST NECESSITY JUSTIFIED THE CONVENING AUTHORITY’S DECISION TO WITHDRAW CHARGES.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Easton, 71 M.J. 6, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1071 (Ark. 2011).
71 M.J. 6 (United States v. Easton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.