United States v. Easton
71 M.J. 6, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1071
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedDecember 15, 2011
DocketNo. 12-0053/AR
StatusPublished
This text of 71 M.J. 6 (United States v. Easton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Easton, 71 M.J. 6, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1071 (Ark. 2011).
Opinion
CCA 20080640. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE ARMY COURT ERRED IN HOLDING THE APPELLANT’S TRIAL DID NOT VIOLATE HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AGAINST DOUBLE JEOPARDY BECAUSE JEOPARDY DID NOT ATTACH AND EVEN IF IT DID, MANIFEST NECESSITY JUSTIFIED THE CONVENING AUTHORITY’S DECISION TO WITHDRAW CHARGES.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 6, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-easton-armfor-2011.