United States v. Earnshaw
This text of 30 F. 672 (United States v. Earnshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s onfy substantial ground of complaint is ~fche appraiser’s refusal to adjourn the hearing until a future time. Proper notice, was sent him, in pursuance of which his representative attended, and requested an adjournment. This request was refused. Whether it should have been granted the court cannot consider. • The appraisers were the sole judges of this. I cannot assume that they abused their authority, — acted arbitrarily; without exercising the discretion committed to them; and on this ground treat the appraisement as void.
Judgment must therefore be entered on the verdict for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 F. 672, 1887 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-earnshaw-paed-1887.