United States v. Earl William Batten
402 F.2d 477, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5046
This text of 402 F.2d 477 (United States v. Earl William Batten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Earl William Batten, 402 F.2d 477, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5046 (4th Cir. 1968).
Opinion
Having been convicted of bank robbery-in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), Earl William Batten appeals. Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we find no error. The conviction is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bank robbery and incidental crimes
18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
402 F.2d 477, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5046, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-earl-william-batten-ca4-1968.