United States v. Earl Monroe Davis
This text of 431 F.2d 713 (United States v. Earl Monroe Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The sole ground urged on this appeal for reversal of this criminal conviction is that there was a fatal variance between the charge in the indictment and the evidence. After carefully considering the briefs and appendix we find oral argument unnecessary and affirm.
Davis was charged with transporting in interstate commerce a stolen automobile, a 1966 Cadillac VIN L6113519, bearing North Carolina license CS4995. The owner of the automobile testified to the same VIN and the same license number. A police officer who investigated the crime gave the correct vehicle identification number but gave the license number as CS4994.
We think Davis was fully apprised of the charge against him, and that the evidence substantially and sufficiently conformed to the charge in the indictment. See United States v. Guthrie, 387 F.2d 569 (4 Cir. 1967); United States v. Bully, 282 F.Supp. 327 (E.D.Va.1968), aff’d, 408 F.2d 974 (4 Cir. 1969).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
431 F.2d 713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-earl-monroe-davis-ca4-1970.