United States v. Dymo Industries, Inc., and Modulux, Inc.
This text of 418 F.2d 500 (United States v. Dymo Industries, Inc., and Modulux, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
418 F.2d 500
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,
v.
DYMO INDUSTRIES, INC., and Modulux, Inc., Appellees.
No. 24930.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
December 19, 1969.
Certiorari Denied February 27, 1970.
See 90 S.Ct. 946.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Oliver J. Carter, Judge.
Carl Hoppe (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Gilbert Pavlovsky (argued), Atty. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Marquis L. Smith, Chief, Anti-Trust Div., Cecil F. Poole, U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellees.
Before HAMLEY, BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The order appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Court. In re Dymo Industries, Inc., D.C.N.D.Cal., 1969, 300 F.Supp. 532.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 F.2d 500, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dymo-industries-inc-and-modulux-in-ca9-1970.