United States v. Dwight Spears

59 F.3d 168, 1995 WL 370480
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 22, 1995
Docket95-6087
StatusPublished

This text of 59 F.3d 168 (United States v. Dwight Spears) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dwight Spears, 59 F.3d 168, 1995 WL 370480 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

59 F.3d 168
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Dwight SPEARS, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6087.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 22, 1995.

Dwight Spears, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to recuse the district judge in his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 F.3d 168, 1995 WL 370480, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dwight-spears-ca4-1995.