United States v. Dwain D. Williams
548 F. App'x 606
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Dwain D. Williams. Read the opinion of the Court — 509 F. App'x 899 →
Opinion
Ingrid Driskell, counsel for Dwain Williams has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion is GRANTED, and Williams’s sentences are AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Dwain D. Williams, 548 F. App'x 606 (11th Cir. 2013).
548 F. App'x 606 (United States v. Dwain D. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)