United States v. Dury
This text of 670 F. App'x 151 (United States v. Dury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his post-judgment motions to dismiss indictment, for a new trial and for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2016; June 7, 2016). We deny Dury’s motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
670 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dury-ca4-2016.