United States v. Dury

670 F. App'x 151
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6758, No. 16-6841
StatusPublished

This text of 670 F. App'x 151 (United States v. Dury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dury, 670 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his post-judgment motions to dismiss indictment, for a new trial and for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2016; June 7, 2016). We deny Dury’s motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
670 F. App'x 151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dury-ca4-2016.