United States v. Dury

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Dury

670 F. App'x 151

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 4, 2016·No. No. 16-6758, No. 16-6841·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his post-judgment motions to dismiss indictment, for a new trial and for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2016; June 7, 2016). We deny Dury’s motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew James Dury appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his post-judgment motions to dismiss indictment, for a new trial and for recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dury, No. 1:08-cr-00016-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. May 13, 2016; June 7, 2016). We deny Dury’s motion for default judgment and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Dury, 670 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

670 F. App'x 151 (United States v. Dury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.