United States v. Durrani
This text of 320 F. App'x 585 (United States v. Durrani) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Arif Ali Durrani appeals pro se from a notice of document discrepancies, in which the district court rejected his motion for a new trial. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the district court’s rejection of Durrani’s motion was not a final order. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see also Nat’l Distribution Agency v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 117 F.3d 432, 433-34 (9th Cir.1997).
We decline to address Durrani’s remaining contentions.
Durrani’s motion for judicial notice is denied. See Fed.R.Evid. 201(b).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
320 F. App'x 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-durrani-ca9-2009.