United States v. Durden

460 F.2d 318
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 1972
DocketNos. 71-2382, 71-2383
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 460 F.2d 318 (United States v. Durden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Durden, 460 F.2d 318 (9th Cir. 1972).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgments of conviction are affirmed in this cocaine ease.

Lowe asserts entrapment as a matter of law. But we do not get to that when he does not admit to the acts charged. United States v. Hendricks, 456 F.2d 167, 9th Cir., 1972.

We find no prejudicial conduct of the court. The instructions were adequate.

The defendants may now move in trial court under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, for resentencing under the Drug Abuse, Prevention and Control Act, 1970.

The mandate will issue now.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 F.2d 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-durden-ca9-1972.