United States v. Duran, Frank

169 F. App'x 483
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 28, 2006·No. 03-2506·Unpublished

Opinion

ORDER

After being convicted of various charges arising out of his involvement in a drug distribution conspiracy, Frank Duran was sentenced to a lengthy term of imprisonment. On appeal, Duran argued, among other things, that his sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. See United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005); United States v. Paladino, 401 F.3d 471, 481 (7th Cir.2005). We remanded to ask whether the judge would have imposed a lesser sentence had he known that the guidelines were advisory, see Paladino, 401 F.3d at 483-84. He answered that he would. Consequently, we VACATE Duran’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Duran, Frank, 169 F. App'x 483 (7th Cir. 2006).

169 F. App'x 483 (United States v. Duran, Frank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)