United States v. Dunn

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Dunn

487 F. App'x 559

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 24, 2012·No. No. 11-14268·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kipler S. Lamar, appointed counsel for appellant Marco Gary Dunn, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Dunn and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of this appeal is correct. Because our examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dunn’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kipler S. Lamar, appointed counsel for appellant Marco Gary Dunn, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Dunn and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of this appeal is correct. Because our examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dunn’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Dunn, 487 F. App'x 559 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

487 F. App'x 559 (United States v. Dunn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related