United States v. Dunn

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Dunn

487 F. App'x 559

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedAugust 24, 2012

DocketNo. 11-14268

StatusPublished

This text of 487 F. App'x 559 (United States v. Dunn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Dunn, 487 F. App'x 559 (11th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Kipler S. Lamar, appointed counsel for appellant Marco Gary Dunn, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Dunn and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of this appeal is correct. Because our examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dunn’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Kipler S. Lamar, appointed counsel for appellant Marco Gary Dunn, has moved to withdraw from further representation of Dunn and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of this appeal is correct. Because our examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Dunn’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

487 F. App'x 559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dunn-ca11-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack